It all looks good so far, of course I only gave it a quick read :)

There are two things I'd like to further suggest, however:

1) All contributions should be required to submit to a particular 
(non-exclusive) license, similar to what the IRTC does.  Ie, "I agree to 
the standard license, and allow anyone with access to this repository to 
use my contribution for any purpose whatsoever, including making changes 
and submitting patches to the repository."  Or something like that.  The 
point is, if I access something from the repository, I don't want to 
have to read over the license for it to determine whether or not I 
should use it.

2) In the vein of "value-added features", I'd recommend allowing users 
to rate the individual files according to several criteria, such as 
Completeness, Usability, Realism, Uniqueness, etc (those are just 
examples), as well as add comments / reviews about them.  If a 
submission has multiple versions, allow the viewing of aggregate reviews 
(for all versions combined), or for a single version.

...Chambers

Post a reply to this message